Alfredton vs Tol Tol
Property investment comparison - Alfredton, VIC 3350 vs Tol Tol, VIC 3549
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alfredton wins 2, Tol Tol wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Alfredton | Tol Tol |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $670K | - |
| Median unit price | $420K | $590K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.75% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.74% | 3.98% |
| 1-year house growth | +11.1%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.9% | 0.3% |
| Population | 11,822 | 175 |
Alfredton vs Tol Tol: what the numbers say
For units, Alfredton sits at a median of $420K against $590K in Tol Tol, which makes Alfredton the more affordable unit market and Tol Tol the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Tol Tol and 1.9% in Alfredton, so landlords in Tol Tol face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Alfredton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 11,822 against 175, roughly 68 times the size of Tol Tol; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Tol Tol for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison