Alkimos vs Bickley
Property investment comparison - Alkimos, WA 6038 vs Bickley, WA 6076
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alkimos wins 5, Bickley wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Alkimos | Bickley |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $850K | - |
| Median unit price | - | $405K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.30% | 1.66% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.18% | 4.10% |
| 1-year house growth | +18.2% | -1.4% |
| 3-year house growth | +72.9% | +35.7% |
| Vacancy rate | 2.0% | 5.5% |
| Population | 10,203 | 713 |
Alkimos vs Bickley: what the numbers say
On cash flow, Alkimos leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.30%, compared with 1.66% in Bickley, a gap of 2.64 percentage points.
Over the past year house prices moved +18.2% in Alkimos and -1.4% in Bickley, so recent momentum favours Alkimos, while Bickley went backwards.
Looking back three years, Alkimos houses are +72.9% and Bickley houses +35.7%, so Alkimos has compounded faster than Bickley over the longer window.
Rental vacancy is 2.0% in Alkimos and 5.5% in Bickley, so landlords in Alkimos face less competition for tenants.
Alkimos is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,203 against 713, roughly 14 times the size of Bickley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Alkimos for rental income, Alkimos for recent price momentum, Alkimos for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison