Skip to main content

Allanson vs Applecross

Property investment comparison - Allanson, WA 6225 vs Applecross, WA 6153

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Allanson wins 4, Applecross wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAllansonApplecross
Median house price$765K-
Median unit price$395K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.39%2.33%
Gross rental yield (units)4.78%3.58%
1-year house growth+16.2%-5.6%
3-year house growth+67.4%+47.1%
Vacancy rate3.5%1.8%
Population5917,228

Allanson vs Applecross: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Allanson leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.39%, compared with 2.33% in Applecross, a gap of 2.06 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +16.2% in Allanson and -5.6% in Applecross, so recent momentum favours Allanson, while Applecross went backwards.

Looking back three years, Allanson houses are +67.4% and Applecross houses +47.1%, so Allanson has compounded faster than Applecross over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Applecross and 3.5% in Allanson, so landlords in Applecross face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Applecross is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,228 against 591, roughly 12 times the size of Allanson; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Allanson for rental income, Allanson for recent price momentum, Applecross for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison