Skip to main content

Allenby Gardens vs Old Reynella

Property investment comparison - Allenby Gardens, SA 5009 vs Old Reynella, SA 5161

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Allenby Gardens wins 1, Old Reynella wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAllenby GardensOld Reynella
Median house price$1.2M-
Median unit price$920K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.28%3.90%
Gross rental yield (units)-3.90%
1-year house growth+8.0%+12.9%
3-year house growth+33.1%+50.4%
Vacancy rate0.3%0.7%
Population2,0453,458

Allenby Gardens vs Old Reynella: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Old Reynella leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.90%, compared with 3.28% in Allenby Gardens, a gap of 0.62 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.0% in Allenby Gardens and +12.9% in Old Reynella, so recent momentum favours Old Reynella, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Allenby Gardens houses are +33.1% and Old Reynella houses +50.4%, so Old Reynella has compounded faster than Allenby Gardens over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Allenby Gardens and 0.7% in Old Reynella, so landlords in Allenby Gardens face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Old Reynella is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,458 against 2,045, larger than Allenby Gardens; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Old Reynella for rental income, Old Reynella for recent price momentum, Allenby Gardens for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison