Skip to main content

Allenby Gardens vs Seaford Meadows

Property investment comparison - Allenby Gardens, SA 5009 vs Seaford Meadows, SA 5169

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Allenby Gardens wins 1, Seaford Meadows wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAllenby GardensSeaford Meadows
Median house price$1.2M-
Median unit price$920K$545K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.28%-
Gross rental yield (units)-5.06%
1-year house growth+8.0%+11.1%
3-year house growth+33.1%+36.3%
Vacancy rate0.3%0.5%
Population2,0455,102

Allenby Gardens vs Seaford Meadows: what the numbers say

For units, Allenby Gardens sits at a median of $920K against $545K in Seaford Meadows, which makes Seaford Meadows the more affordable unit market and Allenby Gardens the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.0% in Allenby Gardens and +11.1% in Seaford Meadows, so recent momentum favours Seaford Meadows, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Allenby Gardens houses are +33.1% and Seaford Meadows houses +36.3%, so Seaford Meadows has compounded faster than Allenby Gardens over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Allenby Gardens and 0.5% in Seaford Meadows, so landlords in Allenby Gardens face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Seaford Meadows is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,102 against 2,045, roughly 2.5 times the size of Allenby Gardens; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Seaford Meadows for recent price momentum, Allenby Gardens for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison