Skip to main content

Altona Meadows vs Ballendella

Property investment comparison - Altona Meadows, VIC 3028 vs Ballendella, VIC 3561

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Altona Meadows wins 2, Ballendella wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAltona MeadowsBallendella
Median house price$775K$775K
Median unit price$560K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.65%2.69%
Gross rental yield (units)4.37%-
1-year house growth+5.4%-
3-year house growth+11.6%-
Vacancy rate1.5%2.6%
Population18,479120

Altona Meadows vs Ballendella: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $775K in Altona Meadows and $775K in Ballendella.

On cash flow, Altona Meadows leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.65%, compared with 2.69% in Ballendella, a gap of 0.96 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Altona Meadows and 2.6% in Ballendella, so landlords in Altona Meadows face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Altona Meadows is the bigger suburb, with a population of 18,479 against 120, roughly 154 times the size of Ballendella; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Altona Meadows for rental income, Altona Meadows for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison