Skip to main content

Ambarvale vs Buttaba

Property investment comparison - Ambarvale, NSW 2560 vs Buttaba, NSW 2283

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ambarvale wins 1, Buttaba wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAmbarvaleButtaba
Median house price$980K$980K
Median unit price$655K$600K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.22%3.53%
Gross rental yield (units)3.65%4.69%
1-year house growth+9.2%+12.4%estimate
3-year house growth+21.8%-
Vacancy rate1.0%1.4%
Population7,2541,204

Ambarvale vs Buttaba: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $980K in Ambarvale and $980K in Buttaba.

For units, Ambarvale sits at a median of $655K against $600K in Buttaba, which makes Buttaba the more affordable unit market and Ambarvale the pricier one.

On cash flow, Buttaba leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.53%, compared with 3.22% in Ambarvale, a gap of 0.31 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.2% in Ambarvale and +12.4% in Buttaba (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Buttaba, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Ambarvale and 1.4% in Buttaba, so landlords in Ambarvale face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Ambarvale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,254 against 1,204, roughly 6 times the size of Buttaba; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Buttaba for rental income, Buttaba for recent price momentum, Ambarvale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison