Ambleside vs Mount Hicks
Property investment comparison - Ambleside, TAS 7310 vs Mount Hicks, TAS 7325
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ambleside wins 1, Mount Hicks wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Ambleside | Mount Hicks |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $680K | - |
| Median unit price | - | $375K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.09% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.41% | 5.91% |
| 1-year house growth | +12.6%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.7% | 6.7% |
| Population | 695 | 356 |
Ambleside vs Mount Hicks: what the numbers say
Rental vacancy is 1.7% in Ambleside and 6.7% in Mount Hicks, so landlords in Ambleside face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Ambleside is the bigger suburb, with a population of 695 against 356, larger than Mount Hicks; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Ambleside for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison