Skip to main content

Angus vs Clemton Park

Property investment comparison - Angus, NSW 2765 vs Clemton Park, NSW 2206

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Angus wins 1, Clemton Park wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAngusClemton Park
Median house price$1.9M$1.9M
Median unit price$860K$805K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.51%2.47%
Gross rental yield (units)3.65%4.96%
1-year house growth-+7.3%
3-year house growth-+20.2%
Vacancy rate6.0%0.8%
Population3841,676

Angus vs Clemton Park: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.9M in Angus and $1.9M in Clemton Park, so Clemton Park is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Angus sits at a median of $860K against $805K in Clemton Park, which makes Clemton Park the more affordable unit market and Angus the pricier one.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 2.51% in Angus and 2.47% in Clemton Park, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Clemton Park and 6.0% in Angus, so landlords in Clemton Park face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Clemton Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,676 against 384, roughly 4.4 times the size of Angus; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Clemton Park for a lower purchase price, Clemton Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison