Skip to main content

Angus vs Gymea

Property investment comparison - Angus, NSW 2765 vs Gymea, NSW 2227

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Angus wins 1, Gymea wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAngusGymea
Median house price$1.9M$1.9M
Median unit price$860K$1.1M
Gross rental yield (houses)2.51%3.07%
Gross rental yield (units)3.65%3.75%
1-year house growth--0.9%
3-year house growth-+18.0%
Vacancy rate6.0%0.9%
Population3848,219

Angus vs Gymea: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.9M in Angus and $1.9M in Gymea, so Gymea is the cheaper entry point, with Angus houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Angus sits at a median of $860K against $1.1M in Gymea, which makes Angus the more affordable unit market and Gymea the pricier one.

On cash flow, Gymea leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.07%, compared with 2.51% in Angus, a gap of 0.56 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Gymea and 6.0% in Angus, so landlords in Gymea face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Gymea is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,219 against 384, roughly 21 times the size of Angus; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Gymea for rental income, Gymea for a lower purchase price, Gymea for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison