Skip to main content

Angus vs North Parramatta

Property investment comparison - Angus, NSW 2765 vs North Parramatta, NSW 2151

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Angus wins 1, North Parramatta wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAngusNorth Parramatta
Median house price$1.9M$1.9M
Median unit price$860K$700K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.51%2.19%
Gross rental yield (units)3.65%-
1-year house growth-+5.2%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate6.0%0.8%
Population38412,064

Angus vs North Parramatta: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.9M in Angus and $1.9M in North Parramatta, so North Parramatta is the cheaper entry point, with Angus houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Angus sits at a median of $860K against $700K in North Parramatta, which makes North Parramatta the more affordable unit market and Angus the pricier one.

On cash flow, Angus leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.51%, compared with 2.19% in North Parramatta, a gap of 0.32 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in North Parramatta and 6.0% in Angus, so landlords in North Parramatta face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

North Parramatta is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,064 against 384, roughly 31 times the size of Angus; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Angus for rental income, North Parramatta for a lower purchase price, North Parramatta for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison