Anketell vs Applecross
Property investment comparison - Anketell, WA 6167 vs Applecross, WA 6153
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Anketell wins 3, Applecross wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Anketell | Applecross |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $805K | - |
| Median unit price | $630K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.50% | 2.33% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.81% | 3.58% |
| 1-year house growth | +18.7%estimate | -5.6% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +47.1% |
| Vacancy rate | 2.9% | 1.8% |
| Population | 280 | 7,228 |
Anketell vs Applecross: what the numbers say
On cash flow, Anketell leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.50%, compared with 2.33% in Applecross, a gap of 2.17 percentage points.
Over the past year house prices moved +18.7% in Anketell (an estimate) and -5.6% in Applecross, so recent momentum favours Anketell, while Applecross went backwards.
Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Applecross and 2.9% in Anketell, so landlords in Applecross face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Applecross is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,228 against 280, roughly 26 times the size of Anketell; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Anketell for rental income, Anketell for recent price momentum, Applecross for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison