Skip to main content

Anketell vs Beldon

Property investment comparison - Anketell, WA 6167 vs Beldon, WA 6027

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Anketell wins 2, Beldon wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAnketellBeldon
Median house price$810K-
Median unit price$670K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.40%4.00%
Gross rental yield (units)3.00%3.78%
1-year house growth+20.2%+18.9%
3-year house growth-11.7%+67.6%
Vacancy rate2.9%0.5%
Population2804,094

Anketell vs Beldon: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Anketell leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.40%, compared with 4.00% in Beldon, a gap of 0.40 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +20.2% in Anketell and +18.9% in Beldon, so recent momentum favours Anketell, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Anketell houses are -11.7% and Beldon houses +67.6%, so Beldon has compounded faster than Anketell over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Beldon and 2.9% in Anketell, so landlords in Beldon face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Beldon is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,094 against 280, roughly 15 times the size of Anketell; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Anketell for rental income, Anketell for recent price momentum, Beldon for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison