Skip to main content

Anketell vs Hammond Park

Property investment comparison - Anketell, WA 6167 vs Hammond Park, WA 6164

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Anketell wins 0, Hammond Park wins 5. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAnketellHammond Park
Median house price$810K-
Median unit price$670K$650K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.40%-
Gross rental yield (units)3.00%5.76%
1-year house growth+20.2%+22.5%
3-year house growth-11.7%+66.0%
Vacancy rate2.9%0.9%
Population2806,985

Anketell vs Hammond Park: what the numbers say

For units, Anketell sits at a median of $670K against $650K in Hammond Park, which makes Hammond Park the more affordable unit market and Anketell the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +20.2% in Anketell and +22.5% in Hammond Park, so recent momentum favours Hammond Park, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Anketell houses are -11.7% and Hammond Park houses +66.0%, so Hammond Park has compounded faster than Anketell over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Hammond Park and 2.9% in Anketell, so landlords in Hammond Park face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Hammond Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,985 against 280, roughly 25 times the size of Anketell; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Hammond Park for recent price momentum, Hammond Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison