Skip to main content

Anketell vs Kalamunda

Property investment comparison - Anketell, WA 6167 vs Kalamunda, WA 6076

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Anketell wins 2, Kalamunda wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAnketellKalamunda
Median house price$810K-
Median unit price$670K$785K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.40%-
Gross rental yield (units)3.00%4.07%
1-year house growth+20.2%+18.9%
3-year house growth-11.7%+64.1%
Vacancy rate2.9%0.3%
Population2807,163

Anketell vs Kalamunda: what the numbers say

For units, Anketell sits at a median of $670K against $785K in Kalamunda, which makes Anketell the more affordable unit market and Kalamunda the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +20.2% in Anketell and +18.9% in Kalamunda, so recent momentum favours Anketell, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Anketell houses are -11.7% and Kalamunda houses +64.1%, so Kalamunda has compounded faster than Anketell over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Kalamunda and 2.9% in Anketell, so landlords in Kalamunda face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Kalamunda is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,163 against 280, roughly 26 times the size of Anketell; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Anketell for recent price momentum, Kalamunda for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison