Anketell vs Mandurah
Property investment comparison - Anketell, WA 6167 vs Mandurah, WA 6210
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Anketell wins 1, Mandurah wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Anketell | Mandurah |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $810K | - |
| Median unit price | $670K | $615K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.40% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.00% | 5.11% |
| 1-year house growth | +20.2% | +19.6%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | -11.7% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.9% | 1.5% |
| Population | 280 | 8,804 |
Anketell vs Mandurah: what the numbers say
For units, Anketell sits at a median of $670K against $615K in Mandurah, which makes Mandurah the more affordable unit market and Anketell the pricier one.
Over the past year house prices moved +20.2% in Anketell and +19.6% in Mandurah (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Anketell, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Mandurah and 2.9% in Anketell, so landlords in Mandurah face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Mandurah is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,804 against 280, roughly 31 times the size of Anketell; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Anketell for recent price momentum, Mandurah for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison