Skip to main content

Anketell vs North Coogee

Property investment comparison - Anketell, WA 6167 vs North Coogee, WA 6163

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Anketell wins 3, North Coogee wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAnketellNorth Coogee
Median house price$810K-
Median unit price$670K$900K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.40%3.33%
Gross rental yield (units)3.00%-
1-year house growth+20.2%+6.4%estimate
3-year house growth-11.7%-
Vacancy rate2.9%2.0%
Population2803,741

Anketell vs North Coogee: what the numbers say

For units, Anketell sits at a median of $670K against $900K in North Coogee, which makes Anketell the more affordable unit market and North Coogee the pricier one.

On cash flow, Anketell leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.40%, compared with 3.33% in North Coogee, a gap of 1.07 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +20.2% in Anketell and +6.4% in North Coogee (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Anketell, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 2.0% in North Coogee and 2.9% in Anketell, so landlords in North Coogee face less competition for tenants.

North Coogee is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,741 against 280, roughly 13 times the size of Anketell; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Anketell for rental income, Anketell for recent price momentum, North Coogee for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison