Skip to main content

Anketell vs Viveash

Property investment comparison - Anketell, WA 6167 vs Viveash, WA 6056

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Anketell wins 1, Viveash wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAnketellViveash
Median house price$810K-
Median unit price$670K$655K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.40%4.50%
Gross rental yield (units)3.00%4.84%
1-year house growth+20.2%+18.4%estimate
3-year house growth-11.7%-
Vacancy rate2.9%0.5%
Population2801,280

Anketell vs Viveash: what the numbers say

For units, Anketell sits at a median of $670K against $655K in Viveash, which makes Viveash the more affordable unit market and Anketell the pricier one.

On cash flow, Viveash leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.50%, compared with 4.40% in Anketell, a gap of 0.10 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +20.2% in Anketell and +18.4% in Viveash (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Anketell, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Viveash and 2.9% in Anketell, so landlords in Viveash face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Viveash is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,280 against 280, roughly 4.6 times the size of Anketell; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Viveash for rental income, Anketell for recent price momentum, Viveash for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison