Skip to main content

Anketell vs Wandi

Property investment comparison - Anketell, WA 6167 vs Wandi, WA 6167

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Anketell wins 1, Wandi wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAnketellWandi
Median house price$810K-
Median unit price$670K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.40%4.20%
Gross rental yield (units)3.00%4.11%
1-year house growth+20.2%+21.3%
3-year house growth-11.7%+59.1%
Vacancy rate2.9%1.9%
Population2804,324

Anketell vs Wandi: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Anketell leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.40%, compared with 4.20% in Wandi, a gap of 0.20 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +20.2% in Anketell and +21.3% in Wandi, so recent momentum favours Wandi, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Anketell houses are -11.7% and Wandi houses +59.1%, so Wandi has compounded faster than Anketell over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Wandi and 2.9% in Anketell, so landlords in Wandi face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Wandi is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,324 against 280, roughly 15 times the size of Anketell; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Anketell for rental income, Wandi for recent price momentum, Wandi for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison