Skip to main content

Anketell vs Wungong

Property investment comparison - Anketell, WA 6167 vs Wungong, WA 6112

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Anketell wins 2, Wungong wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAnketellWungong
Median house price$810K-
Median unit price$670K$485K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.40%1.97%
Gross rental yield (units)3.00%5.71%
1-year house growth+20.2%+21.0%
3-year house growth-11.7%+80.0%
Vacancy rate2.9%4.6%
Population280370

Anketell vs Wungong: what the numbers say

For units, Anketell sits at a median of $670K against $485K in Wungong, which makes Wungong the more affordable unit market and Anketell the pricier one.

On cash flow, Anketell leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.40%, compared with 1.97% in Wungong, a gap of 2.43 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +20.2% in Anketell and +21.0% in Wungong, so recent momentum favours Wungong, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Anketell houses are -11.7% and Wungong houses +80.0%, so Wungong has compounded faster than Anketell over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 2.9% in Anketell and 4.6% in Wungong, so landlords in Anketell face less competition for tenants.

Wungong is the bigger suburb, with a population of 370 against 280, larger than Anketell; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Anketell for rental income, Wungong for recent price momentum, Anketell for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison