Skip to main content

Annerley vs Macgregor

Property investment comparison - Annerley, QLD 4103 vs Macgregor, QLD 4109

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Annerley wins 4, Macgregor wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAnnerleyMacgregor
Median house price$1.5M$1.5M
Median unit price-$725K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.80%-
Gross rental yield (units)3.88%3.81%
1-year house growth+9.8%+7.9%
3-year house growth+32.1%+52.9%
Vacancy rate0.9%1.8%
Population11,8915,980

Annerley vs Macgregor: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.5M in Annerley and $1.5M in Macgregor, so Annerley is the cheaper entry point, with Macgregor houses about 2% dearer.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.8% in Annerley and +7.9% in Macgregor, so recent momentum favours Annerley, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Annerley houses are +32.1% and Macgregor houses +52.9%, so Macgregor has compounded faster than Annerley over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Annerley and 1.8% in Macgregor, so landlords in Annerley face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Annerley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 11,891 against 5,980, larger than Macgregor; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Annerley for a lower purchase price, Annerley for recent price momentum, Annerley for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison