Apollo Bay vs Childers
Property investment comparison - Apollo Bay, VIC 3233 vs Childers, VIC 3824
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Apollo Bay wins 2, Childers wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Apollo Bay | Childers |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $800K | $805K |
| Median unit price | $710K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.33% | 3.77% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | - |
| 1-year house growth | -6.3%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.1% | 1.1% |
| Population | 1,790 | 91 |
Apollo Bay vs Childers: what the numbers say
The median house price is $800K in Apollo Bay and $805K in Childers, so Apollo Bay is the cheaper entry point, with Childers houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Childers leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.77%, compared with 3.33% in Apollo Bay, a gap of 0.44 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.1%.
Apollo Bay is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,790 against 91, roughly 20 times the size of Childers; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Childers for rental income, Apollo Bay for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison