Appin vs Hoxton Park
Property investment comparison - Appin, NSW 2560 vs Hoxton Park, NSW 2171
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Appin wins 1, Hoxton Park wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Appin | Hoxton Park |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.2M | $1.2M |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.70% | 2.99% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.03% | 4.19% |
| 1-year house growth | +9.8%estimate | +7.6%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 3.5% | 2.2% |
| Population | 3,213 | 4,572 |
Appin vs Hoxton Park: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.2M in Appin and $1.2M in Hoxton Park.
On cash flow, Hoxton Park leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.99%, compared with 2.70% in Appin, a gap of 0.29 percentage points.
Over the past year house prices moved +9.8% in Appin (an estimate) and +7.6% in Hoxton Park (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Appin, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 2.2% in Hoxton Park and 3.5% in Appin, so landlords in Hoxton Park face less competition for tenants.
Hoxton Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,572 against 3,213, larger than Appin; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Hoxton Park for rental income, Appin for recent price momentum, Hoxton Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison