Ardeer vs Nurran
Property investment comparison - Ardeer, VIC 3022 vs Nurran, VIC 3888
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ardeer wins 2, Nurran wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Ardeer | Nurran |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $715K | $715K |
| Median unit price | $580K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.63% | 3.28% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.65% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +5.6% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +12.6% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.6% | 1.1% |
| Population | 3,170 | 7 |
Ardeer vs Nurran: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $715K in Ardeer and $715K in Nurran.
On cash flow, Ardeer leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.63%, compared with 3.28% in Nurran, a gap of 0.35 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Ardeer and 1.1% in Nurran, so landlords in Ardeer face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Ardeer is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,170 against 7, roughly 453 times the size of Nurran; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Ardeer for rental income, Ardeer for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison