Ardeer vs Windermere
Property investment comparison - Ardeer, VIC 3022 vs Windermere, VIC 3352
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ardeer wins 1, Windermere wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Ardeer | Windermere |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $715K | $715K |
| Median unit price | $580K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.63% | 3.72% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.65% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +5.6% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +12.6% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.6% | 1.6% |
| Population | 3,170 | 96 |
Ardeer vs Windermere: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $715K in Ardeer and $715K in Windermere.
On cash flow, Windermere leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.72%, compared with 3.63% in Ardeer, a gap of 0.09 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Ardeer and 1.6% in Windermere, so landlords in Ardeer face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Ardeer is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,170 against 96, roughly 33 times the size of Windermere; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Windermere for rental income, Ardeer for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison