Skip to main content

Armadale vs Harcourt North

Property investment comparison - Armadale, VIC 3143 vs Harcourt North, VIC 3453

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Armadale wins 2, Harcourt North wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricArmadaleHarcourt North
Median house price$2.2M$2.1M
Median unit price$680K$735K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.75%1.33%
Gross rental yield (units)4.78%-
1-year house growth-4.0%-
3-year house growth-20.3%-
Vacancy rate1.4%1.3%
Population9,368291

Armadale vs Harcourt North: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.2M in Armadale and $2.1M in Harcourt North, so Harcourt North is the cheaper entry point, with Armadale houses about 4% dearer.

For units, Armadale sits at a median of $680K against $735K in Harcourt North, which makes Armadale the more affordable unit market and Harcourt North the pricier one.

On cash flow, Armadale leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.75%, compared with 1.33% in Harcourt North, a gap of 1.42 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Harcourt North and 1.4% in Armadale, so landlords in Harcourt North face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Armadale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,368 against 291, roughly 32 times the size of Harcourt North; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Armadale for rental income, Harcourt North for a lower purchase price, Harcourt North for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison