Skip to main content

Ascot Vale vs Edithvale

Property investment comparison - Ascot Vale, VIC 3032 vs Edithvale, VIC 3196

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ascot Vale wins 3, Edithvale wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAscot ValeEdithvale
Median house price$1.4M$1.3M
Median unit price$670K$860K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.97%3.02%
Gross rental yield (units)4.39%4.00%
1-year house growth+5.2%estimate+4.0%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.8%1.8%
Population15,1976,276

Ascot Vale vs Edithvale: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.4M in Ascot Vale and $1.3M in Edithvale, so Edithvale is the cheaper entry point, with Ascot Vale houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Ascot Vale sits at a median of $670K against $860K in Edithvale, which makes Ascot Vale the more affordable unit market and Edithvale the pricier one.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 2.97% in Ascot Vale and 3.02% in Edithvale, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +5.2% in Ascot Vale (an estimate) and +4.0% in Edithvale (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Ascot Vale, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.8%.

Ascot Vale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 15,197 against 6,276, roughly 2.4 times the size of Edithvale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Edithvale for a lower purchase price, Ascot Vale for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison