Ascot Vale vs Nalangil
Property investment comparison - Ascot Vale, VIC 3032 vs Nalangil, VIC 3249
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ascot Vale wins 2, Nalangil wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Ascot Vale | Nalangil |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.4M | $1.4M |
| Median unit price | $670K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.97% | 1.78% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.39% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +5.2%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.8% | 1.1% |
| Population | 15,197 | 72 |
Ascot Vale vs Nalangil: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.4M in Ascot Vale and $1.4M in Nalangil, so Ascot Vale is the cheaper entry point.
On cash flow, Ascot Vale leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.97%, compared with 1.78% in Nalangil, a gap of 1.19 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Nalangil and 1.8% in Ascot Vale, so landlords in Nalangil face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Ascot Vale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 15,197 against 72, roughly 211 times the size of Nalangil; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Ascot Vale for rental income, Ascot Vale for a lower purchase price, Nalangil for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison