Skip to main content

Ascot vs North Lake

Property investment comparison - Ascot, WA 6104 vs North Lake, WA 6163

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ascot wins 2, North Lake wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAscotNorth Lake
Median house price$1.4M$1.3M
Median unit price$610K$635K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.80%
Gross rental yield (units)5.25%5.39%
1-year house growth+18.2%+21.1%
3-year house growth+60.0%+57.2%
Vacancy rate0.6%0.3%
Population3,0951,299

Ascot vs North Lake: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.4M in Ascot and $1.3M in North Lake, so North Lake is the cheaper entry point, with Ascot houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Ascot sits at a median of $610K against $635K in North Lake, which makes Ascot the more affordable unit market and North Lake the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +18.2% in Ascot and +21.1% in North Lake, so recent momentum favours North Lake, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Ascot houses are +60.0% and North Lake houses +57.2%, so Ascot has compounded faster than North Lake over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in North Lake and 0.6% in Ascot, so landlords in North Lake face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Ascot is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,095 against 1,299, roughly 2.4 times the size of North Lake; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: North Lake for a lower purchase price, North Lake for recent price momentum, North Lake for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison