Skip to main content

Ashtonfield vs Manyana

Property investment comparison - Ashtonfield, NSW 2323 vs Manyana, NSW 2539

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ashtonfield wins 4, Manyana wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAshtonfieldManyana
Median house price$905K$905K
Median unit price-$695K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.10%2.87%
Gross rental yield (units)4.53%4.06%
1-year house growth+6.3%-2.2%
3-year house growth+24.6%+13.4%
Vacancy rate2.5%0.7%
Population4,589670

Ashtonfield vs Manyana: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $905K in Ashtonfield and $905K in Manyana.

On cash flow, Ashtonfield leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.10%, compared with 2.87% in Manyana, a gap of 1.23 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.3% in Ashtonfield and -2.2% in Manyana, so recent momentum favours Ashtonfield, while Manyana went backwards.

Looking back three years, Ashtonfield houses are +24.6% and Manyana houses +13.4%, so Ashtonfield has compounded faster than Manyana over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Manyana and 2.5% in Ashtonfield, so landlords in Manyana face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Ashtonfield is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,589 against 670, roughly 7 times the size of Manyana; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Ashtonfield for rental income, Ashtonfield for recent price momentum, Manyana for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison