Ashtonfield vs Pyree
Property investment comparison - Ashtonfield, NSW 2323 vs Pyree, NSW 2540
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ashtonfield wins 2, Pyree wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Ashtonfield | Pyree |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $905K | $905K |
| Median unit price | - | $625K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.10% | 3.97% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.53% | 4.38% |
| 1-year house growth | +6.3% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +24.6% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.5% | 2.5% |
| Population | 4,589 | 110 |
Ashtonfield vs Pyree: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $905K in Ashtonfield and $905K in Pyree.
On cash flow, Ashtonfield leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.10%, compared with 3.97% in Pyree, a gap of 0.13 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 2.5%.
Ashtonfield is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,589 against 110, roughly 42 times the size of Pyree; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Ashtonfield for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison