Skip to main content

Ashwood vs Blairgowrie

Property investment comparison - Ashwood, VIC 3147 vs Blairgowrie, VIC 3942

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ashwood wins 2, Blairgowrie wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAshwoodBlairgowrie
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price$1.0M$750K
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.36%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.93%
1-year house growth-6.2%-2.4%
3-year house growth-1.4%-13.6%
Vacancy rate0.6%2.4%
Population7,1542,786

Ashwood vs Blairgowrie: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.4M in Ashwood and $1.4M in Blairgowrie, so Blairgowrie is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Ashwood sits at a median of $1.0M against $750K in Blairgowrie, which makes Blairgowrie the more affordable unit market and Ashwood the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved -6.2% in Ashwood and -2.4% in Blairgowrie, so recent momentum favours Blairgowrie, while Ashwood went backwards.

Looking back three years, Ashwood houses are -1.4% and Blairgowrie houses -13.6%, so Ashwood has compounded faster than Blairgowrie over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Ashwood and 2.4% in Blairgowrie, so landlords in Ashwood face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Ashwood is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,154 against 2,786, roughly 2.6 times the size of Blairgowrie; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Blairgowrie for a lower purchase price, Blairgowrie for recent price momentum, Ashwood for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison