Skip to main content

Aspendale Gardens vs Vermont

Property investment comparison - Aspendale Gardens, VIC 3195 vs Vermont, VIC 3133

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aspendale Gardens wins 2, Vermont wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAspendale GardensVermont
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price-$895K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.29%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.38%3.49%
1-year house growth+5.9%estimate+0.4%
3-year house growth-+9.7%
Vacancy rate1.8%1.5%
Population6,42710,993

Aspendale Gardens vs Vermont: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.3M in Aspendale Gardens and $1.3M in Vermont.

Over the past year house prices moved +5.9% in Aspendale Gardens (an estimate) and +0.4% in Vermont, so recent momentum favours Aspendale Gardens, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Vermont and 1.8% in Aspendale Gardens, so landlords in Vermont face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Vermont is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,993 against 6,427, larger than Aspendale Gardens; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aspendale Gardens for recent price momentum, Vermont for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison