Skip to main content

Asquith vs Bexley

Property investment comparison - Asquith, NSW 2077 vs Bexley, NSW 2207

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Asquith wins 4, Bexley wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAsquithBexley
Median house price$1.8M$1.8M
Median unit price$715K$850K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.48%-
Gross rental yield (units)5.15%3.96%
1-year house growth-5.2%estimate+2.1%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.4%1.9%
Population6,16019,646

Asquith vs Bexley: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.8M in Asquith and $1.8M in Bexley, so Asquith is the cheaper entry point, with Bexley houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Asquith sits at a median of $715K against $850K in Bexley, which makes Asquith the more affordable unit market and Bexley the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved -5.2% in Asquith (an estimate) and +2.1% in Bexley (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Bexley, while Asquith went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Asquith and 1.9% in Bexley, so landlords in Asquith face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Bexley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 19,646 against 6,160, roughly 3.2 times the size of Asquith; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Asquith for a lower purchase price, Bexley for recent price momentum, Asquith for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison