Skip to main content

Athelstone vs Erindale

Property investment comparison - Athelstone, SA 5076 vs Erindale, SA 5066

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Athelstone wins 2, Erindale wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAthelstoneErindale
Median house price$1.1M-
Median unit price$630K$570K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.30%-
Gross rental yield (units)-4.67%
1-year house growth+14.1%+5.4%
3-year house growth+41.1%+48.9%
Vacancy rate0.5%4.9%
Population9,6011,172

Athelstone vs Erindale: what the numbers say

For units, Athelstone sits at a median of $630K against $570K in Erindale, which makes Erindale the more affordable unit market and Athelstone the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.1% in Athelstone and +5.4% in Erindale, so recent momentum favours Athelstone, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Athelstone houses are +41.1% and Erindale houses +48.9%, so Erindale has compounded faster than Athelstone over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Athelstone and 4.9% in Erindale, so landlords in Athelstone face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Athelstone is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,601 against 1,172, roughly 8 times the size of Erindale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Athelstone for recent price momentum, Athelstone for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison