Skip to main content

Athelstone vs Hope Valley

Property investment comparison - Athelstone, SA 5076 vs Hope Valley, SA 5090

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Athelstone wins 4, Hope Valley wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAthelstoneHope Valley
Median house price$1.1M-
Median unit price$630K$650K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.30%-
Gross rental yield (units)-4.27%
1-year house growth+14.1%+11.7%
3-year house growth+41.1%+37.5%
Vacancy rate0.5%0.9%
Population9,6018,184

Athelstone vs Hope Valley: what the numbers say

For units, Athelstone sits at a median of $630K against $650K in Hope Valley, which makes Athelstone the more affordable unit market and Hope Valley the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.1% in Athelstone and +11.7% in Hope Valley, so recent momentum favours Athelstone, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Athelstone houses are +41.1% and Hope Valley houses +37.5%, so Athelstone has compounded faster than Hope Valley over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Athelstone and 0.9% in Hope Valley, so landlords in Athelstone face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Athelstone is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,601 against 8,184, larger than Hope Valley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Athelstone for recent price momentum, Athelstone for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison