Athelstone vs Ingle Farm
Property investment comparison - Athelstone, SA 5076 vs Ingle Farm, SA 5098
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Athelstone wins 1, Ingle Farm wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Athelstone | Ingle Farm |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.1M | - |
| Median unit price | $630K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.30% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.95% |
| 1-year house growth | +14.1% | +14.3% |
| 3-year house growth | +41.1% | +52.0% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.5% | 0.9% |
| Population | 9,601 | 9,543 |
Athelstone vs Ingle Farm: what the numbers say
Over the past year house prices moved +14.1% in Athelstone and +14.3% in Ingle Farm, so recent momentum favours Ingle Farm, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Looking back three years, Athelstone houses are +41.1% and Ingle Farm houses +52.0%, so Ingle Farm has compounded faster than Athelstone over the longer window.
Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Athelstone and 0.9% in Ingle Farm, so landlords in Athelstone face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Athelstone is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,601 against 9,543, larger than Ingle Farm; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Ingle Farm for recent price momentum, Athelstone for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison