Skip to main content

Athelstone vs Old Reynella

Property investment comparison - Athelstone, SA 5076 vs Old Reynella, SA 5161

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Athelstone wins 2, Old Reynella wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAthelstoneOld Reynella
Median house price$1.1M-
Median unit price$630K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.30%3.90%
Gross rental yield (units)-3.90%
1-year house growth+14.1%+12.9%
3-year house growth+41.1%+50.4%
Vacancy rate0.5%0.7%
Population9,6013,458

Athelstone vs Old Reynella: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Old Reynella leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.90%, compared with 3.30% in Athelstone, a gap of 0.60 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.1% in Athelstone and +12.9% in Old Reynella, so recent momentum favours Athelstone, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Athelstone houses are +41.1% and Old Reynella houses +50.4%, so Old Reynella has compounded faster than Athelstone over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Athelstone and 0.7% in Old Reynella, so landlords in Athelstone face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Athelstone is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,601 against 3,458, roughly 2.8 times the size of Old Reynella; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Old Reynella for rental income, Athelstone for recent price momentum, Athelstone for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison