Skip to main content

Athelstone vs Seaford Meadows

Property investment comparison - Athelstone, SA 5076 vs Seaford Meadows, SA 5169

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Athelstone wins 2, Seaford Meadows wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAthelstoneSeaford Meadows
Median house price$1.1M-
Median unit price$630K$545K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.30%-
Gross rental yield (units)-5.06%
1-year house growth+14.1%+11.1%
3-year house growth+41.1%+36.3%
Vacancy rate0.5%0.5%
Population9,6015,102

Athelstone vs Seaford Meadows: what the numbers say

For units, Athelstone sits at a median of $630K against $545K in Seaford Meadows, which makes Seaford Meadows the more affordable unit market and Athelstone the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.1% in Athelstone and +11.1% in Seaford Meadows, so recent momentum favours Athelstone, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Athelstone houses are +41.1% and Seaford Meadows houses +36.3%, so Athelstone has compounded faster than Seaford Meadows over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 0.5%.

Athelstone is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,601 against 5,102, larger than Seaford Meadows; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Athelstone for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison