Skip to main content

Aubin Grove vs Woodbridge

Property investment comparison - Aubin Grove, WA 6164 vs Woodbridge, WA 6056

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aubin Grove wins 3, Woodbridge wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAubin GroveWoodbridge
Median house price$1.0M$1.1M
Median unit price-$610K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.03%3.90%
Gross rental yield (units)4.80%-
1-year house growth+13.5%+12.7%estimate
3-year house growth+69.0%-
Vacancy rate1.6%1.3%
Population6,7861,207

Aubin Grove vs Woodbridge: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.0M in Aubin Grove and $1.1M in Woodbridge, so Aubin Grove is the cheaper entry point, with Woodbridge houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Aubin Grove leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.03%, compared with 3.90% in Woodbridge, a gap of 0.13 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +13.5% in Aubin Grove and +12.7% in Woodbridge (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Aubin Grove, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Woodbridge and 1.6% in Aubin Grove, so landlords in Woodbridge face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aubin Grove is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,786 against 1,207, roughly 6 times the size of Woodbridge; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aubin Grove for rental income, Aubin Grove for a lower purchase price, Aubin Grove for recent price momentum, Woodbridge for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison