Skip to main content

Auburn vs The Ponds

Property investment comparison - Auburn, NSW 2144 vs The Ponds, NSW 2769

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Auburn wins 6, The Ponds wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAuburnThe Ponds
Median house price$1.6M$1.6M
Median unit price$595K$1.2M
Gross rental yield (houses)2.49%-
Gross rental yield (units)5.71%2.22%
1-year house growth+8.5%-0.2%
3-year house growth+14.7%+5.6%
Vacancy rate1.4%2.2%
Population39,33316,315

Auburn vs The Ponds: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.6M in Auburn and $1.6M in The Ponds, so Auburn is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Auburn sits at a median of $595K against $1.2M in The Ponds, which makes Auburn the more affordable unit market and The Ponds the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.5% in Auburn and -0.2% in The Ponds, so recent momentum favours Auburn, while The Ponds went backwards.

Looking back three years, Auburn houses are +14.7% and The Ponds houses +5.6%, so Auburn has compounded faster than The Ponds over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Auburn and 2.2% in The Ponds, so landlords in Auburn face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Auburn is the bigger suburb, with a population of 39,333 against 16,315, roughly 2.4 times the size of The Ponds; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Auburn for a lower purchase price, Auburn for recent price momentum, Auburn for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison