Skip to main content

Avoca vs Kingston

Property investment comparison - Avoca, VIC 3467 vs Kingston, VIC 3364

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Avoca wins 2, Kingston wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAvocaKingston
Median house price$400K$405K
Median unit price$320K$315K
Gross rental yield (houses)5.06%7.11%
Gross rental yield (units)2.61%2.76%
1-year house growth+6.0%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.9%1.6%
Population1,356190

Avoca vs Kingston: what the numbers say

The median house price is $400K in Avoca and $405K in Kingston, so Avoca is the cheaper entry point, with Kingston houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Avoca sits at a median of $320K against $315K in Kingston, which makes Kingston the more affordable unit market and Avoca the pricier one.

On cash flow, Kingston leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 7.11%, compared with 5.06% in Avoca, a gap of 2.05 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Avoca and 1.6% in Kingston, so landlords in Avoca face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Avoca is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,356 against 190, roughly 7 times the size of Kingston; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Kingston for rental income, Avoca for a lower purchase price, Avoca for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison