Skip to main content

Avondale vs Mossman

Property investment comparison - Avondale, QLD 4670 vs Mossman, QLD 4873

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Avondale wins 4, Mossman wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAvondaleMossman
Median house price$550K$550K
Median unit price$445K$365K
Gross rental yield (houses)6.32%5.89%
Gross rental yield (units)6.29%5.06%
1-year house growth+13.6%estimate+8.5%
3-year house growth-+18.4%
Vacancy rate1.1%1.5%
Population7011,935

Avondale vs Mossman: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $550K in Avondale and $550K in Mossman.

For units, Avondale sits at a median of $445K against $365K in Mossman, which makes Mossman the more affordable unit market and Avondale the pricier one.

On cash flow, Avondale leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 6.32%, compared with 5.89% in Mossman, a gap of 0.43 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +13.6% in Avondale (an estimate) and +8.5% in Mossman, so recent momentum favours Avondale, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Avondale and 1.5% in Mossman, so landlords in Avondale face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Mossman is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,935 against 701, roughly 2.8 times the size of Avondale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Avondale for rental income, Avondale for recent price momentum, Avondale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison