Avonsleigh vs Loch
Property investment comparison - Avonsleigh, VIC 3782 vs Loch, VIC 3945
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Avonsleigh wins 2, Loch wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Avonsleigh | Loch |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $910K | $905K |
| Median unit price | $815K | $395K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.62% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.57% | 2.74% |
| 1-year house growth | +6.0% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +24.1% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 3.4% | 8.7% |
| Population | 844 | 707 |
Avonsleigh vs Loch: what the numbers say
The median house price is $910K in Avonsleigh and $905K in Loch, so Loch is the cheaper entry point, with Avonsleigh houses about 1% dearer.
For units, Avonsleigh sits at a median of $815K against $395K in Loch, which makes Loch the more affordable unit market and Avonsleigh the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 3.4% in Avonsleigh and 8.7% in Loch, so landlords in Avonsleigh face less competition for tenants.
Avonsleigh is the bigger suburb, with a population of 844 against 707, larger than Loch; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Loch for a lower purchase price, Avonsleigh for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison