Avonsleigh vs Monbulk
Property investment comparison - Avonsleigh, VIC 3782 vs Monbulk, VIC 3793
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Avonsleigh wins 2, Monbulk wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Avonsleigh | Monbulk |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $910K | $910K |
| Median unit price | $815K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.62% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.57% | 2.46% |
| 1-year house growth | +6.0% | +5.7%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | +24.1% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 3.4% | 0.7% |
| Population | 844 | 3,651 |
Avonsleigh vs Monbulk: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $910K in Avonsleigh and $910K in Monbulk.
Over the past year house prices moved +6.0% in Avonsleigh and +5.7% in Monbulk (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Avonsleigh, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Monbulk and 3.4% in Avonsleigh, so landlords in Monbulk face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Monbulk is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,651 against 844, roughly 4.3 times the size of Avonsleigh; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Avonsleigh for recent price momentum, Monbulk for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison