Ayrford vs Dalyston
Property investment comparison - Ayrford, VIC 3268 vs Dalyston, VIC 3992
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ayrford wins 0, Dalyston wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Ayrford | Dalyston |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $535K | $535K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.20% | 4.96% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 3.42% |
| 1-year house growth | - | -0.7% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +1.4% |
| Vacancy rate | 2.7% | 2.5% |
| Population | 39 | 843 |
Ayrford vs Dalyston: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $535K in Ayrford and $535K in Dalyston.
On cash flow, Dalyston leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.96%, compared with 4.20% in Ayrford, a gap of 0.76 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 2.5% in Dalyston and 2.7% in Ayrford, so landlords in Dalyston face less competition for tenants.
Dalyston is the bigger suburb, with a population of 843 against 39, roughly 22 times the size of Ayrford; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Dalyston for rental income, Dalyston for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison