Ballendella vs Killara
Property investment comparison - Ballendella, VIC 3561 vs Killara, VIC 3691
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ballendella wins 1, Killara wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Ballendella | Killara |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $775K | $775K |
| Median unit price | - | $445K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.69% | 4.20% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.06% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +16.4%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.6% | 3.3% |
| Population | 120 | 1,485 |
Ballendella vs Killara: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $775K in Ballendella and $775K in Killara.
On cash flow, Killara leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.20%, compared with 2.69% in Ballendella, a gap of 1.51 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 2.6% in Ballendella and 3.3% in Killara, so landlords in Ballendella face less competition for tenants.
Killara is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,485 against 120, roughly 12 times the size of Ballendella; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Killara for rental income, Ballendella for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison