Skip to main content

Balnarring vs Jan Juc

Property investment comparison - Balnarring, VIC 3926 vs Jan Juc, VIC 3228

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Balnarring wins 1, Jan Juc wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBalnarringJan Juc
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)2.96%3.06%
Gross rental yield (units)3.32%3.74%
1-year house growth-3.6%estimate+0.3%
3-year house growth-+5.5%
Vacancy rate1.7%1.8%
Population2,3714,151

Balnarring vs Jan Juc: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.4M in Balnarring and $1.4M in Jan Juc, so Jan Juc is the cheaper entry point, with Balnarring houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Jan Juc leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.06%, compared with 2.96% in Balnarring, a gap of 0.10 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved -3.6% in Balnarring (an estimate) and +0.3% in Jan Juc, so recent momentum favours Jan Juc, while Balnarring went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.7% in Balnarring and 1.8% in Jan Juc, so landlords in Balnarring face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Jan Juc is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,151 against 2,371, larger than Balnarring; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Jan Juc for rental income, Jan Juc for a lower purchase price, Jan Juc for recent price momentum, Balnarring for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison