Banjup vs North Beach
Property investment comparison - Banjup, WA 6164 vs North Beach, WA 6020
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Banjup wins 0, North Beach wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Banjup | North Beach |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2.2M | $2.1M |
| Median unit price | $790K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 2.30% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.89% | 4.70% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +21.3%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | +75.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.6% | 0.8% |
| Population | 1,377 | 3,689 |
Banjup vs North Beach: what the numbers say
The median house price is $2.2M in Banjup and $2.1M in North Beach, so North Beach is the cheaper entry point, with Banjup houses about 6% dearer.
Rental vacancy is 0.8% in North Beach and 1.6% in Banjup, so landlords in North Beach face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
North Beach is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,689 against 1,377, roughly 2.7 times the size of Banjup; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: North Beach for a lower purchase price, North Beach for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison