Skip to main content

Bannerton vs Churchill

Property investment comparison - Bannerton, VIC 3549 vs Churchill, VIC 3842

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bannerton wins 3, Churchill wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBannertonChurchill
Median house price$455K$460K
Median unit price$525K$350K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.75%5.01%
Gross rental yield (units)5.68%4.63%
1-year house growth-+16.5%
3-year house growth-+29.3%
Vacancy rate0.0%1.8%
Population784,924

Bannerton vs Churchill: what the numbers say

The median house price is $455K in Bannerton and $460K in Churchill, so Bannerton is the cheaper entry point, with Churchill houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Bannerton sits at a median of $525K against $350K in Churchill, which makes Churchill the more affordable unit market and Bannerton the pricier one.

On cash flow, Churchill leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.01%, compared with 4.75% in Bannerton, a gap of 0.26 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.0% in Bannerton and 1.8% in Churchill, so landlords in Bannerton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Churchill is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,924 against 78, roughly 63 times the size of Bannerton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Churchill for rental income, Bannerton for a lower purchase price, Bannerton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Bannerton vs Churchill: Suburb Comparison 2026